10
>
11
Sim
ar
undertaking that no more
prepared Opium would be brought
into the waters of Honghong
in the
Messageries Maritimes Steamers for
the next four months, being the
-period within which we
decision on
the case
thought a might be received
from Paris and London.
13.
in
You will not fail to notice. that there were two main points the judgment of the Supreme Court,- the question of the status of the Ship, : and the question of prepared Opium
in transitu. No doubt Monsieur Slichon had both in view when he declined to give facilities for the service of the Writ. As to the first,
7732.3
72
it is to be regretted that Lord Granville's idea was not carried out of framing
rules to
govern.
cases
of this kind
(Foreign Office's letter 14th November 1879
Despatch No 172, 15th November 1872) For As to the question of prepared
Opium in transit I think it should be met by. alteration of the Opium
ad 2
an
71858
Ordinance of 1858. The Farmer Si38 39 should be deprived of the Ser$839
inconvenient power he
Morv
possesses under that Ordinance, and the Opium Farm should be protected, as at Singapore, by
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.